What happened to the lady who sued McDonald’s for hot coffee?
A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc. McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .Stella Liebeck, the 79-year-old woman who was severely burned by McDonald’s coffee that she spilled in her lap in 1992, was unfairly held up as an example of frivolous litigation in the public eye.In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: Isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?A café or other business might be legally responsible when a customer is burned by hot coffee or tea, but these injury cases are tough to prove.
What is the true story behind the McDonald’s coffee lawsuit?
In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. The jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages to Liebeck, which was reduced to $160,000 in collectible damages, as the jury found Liebeck 20 percent liable for the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2. Afterward, the trial court reduced punitive damages to $480,000.However, McDonald’s refused to settle. The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages — reduced to $160,000 because the jury found her 20 percent at fault — and $2. McDonald’s callous conduct.
Has anyone sued McDonald’s and won?
McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on . Executives at McDonald’s parent company were so enraged that they sued all parties involved, naming Gellar and reportedly banning her from eating at the food chain. In a 2004 interview, she recalled: I wasn’t allowed to eat there.McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .
What is the biggest lawsuit in McDonald’s history?
The $3 million hot coffee incident One of the most famous lawsuits in McDonald’s history happened back in the early 1990s. It all started when a 79-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck ordered a McDonald’s coffee. McDonald’s manual said to keep and serve brewed coffee from 180-190 degrees. Hot Coffee link). Water at 156 degrees can cause 3rd degree burns in 1 second.The Truth Behind McDonald’s Hot Coffee ☕ McDonald’s didn’t just make their coffee hot by accident. They served it at nearly 200 degrees to maximize the smell in the restaurant. Hotter coffee means stronger aroma and stronger aroma means more sales.The Hot Coffee Lawsuit At the time of the incident, McDonald’s policy was to serve coffee between 180°F to 190°F, which is what coffee experts believe to be the ideal temperature to ensure a rich, bold flavor.
How hot was the coffee that the lady sued McDonald’s over?
How Hot Was The Coffee In The Mcdonald’s Lawsuit? The coffee was heated to somewhere between 180 to 190 degrees. This resulted in a severe burn injury that was much worse than many people realize. They ended up paying 2 days worth of coffee sales in the lawsuit they lost, about ~$2. It was not a frivolous lawsuit.