What happened to the lady who sued McDonald’s for hot coffee?
A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc. In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered.A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc.Although Liebeck was awarded $2. As a matter of fact, Liebeck didn’t want to sue McDonald’s at all.The jurors awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages for her pain, suffering, and medical costs, but those damages were reduced to $160,000 because they found her 20 percent responsible. They awarded $2. That amounted to about two days of revenue for McDonald’s coffee sales.How many people claimed to have been burned by hot coffee at McDonalds between 1983 and 1992?During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: Isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?McDonald’s Restaurants, also known as the McDonald’s coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a highly publicized 1994 product liability lawsuit in the United States against the restaurant corporation McDonald’s.McDonald’s current policy is to serve coffee at 176–194 °F (80–90 °C),[38] relying on more sternly worded warnings on cups made of rigid foam to avoid future liability, though it continues to face lawsuits over hot coffee.In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: Isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?
How many burn complaints did McDonalds have?
McDonald’s had logged over 700 prior complaints of burns from its coffee. Experts testified that liquid at 180°F can cause full‑thickness burns in just seconds. McDonald’s admitted its coffee was unsafe to drink at the point of sale. Other establishments sell coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees. Further, McDonalds’ quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees.
Has anyone sued McDonalds and won?
McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on . A woman ordered hot coffee and was awarded $2. McDonald’s gave her exactly what she ordered: hot coffee.A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc.McDonald’s would end up suing Burger King and everyone involved in this spot, including than 4-year-old star Sarah Michelle Gellar. Geller was also banned from eating at McDonald’s.McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .A café or other business might be legally responsible when a customer is burned by hot coffee or tea, but these injury cases are tough to prove.
What is the hot coffee documentary on Netflix?
This documentary examines the so-called hot coffee lawsuit in which a woman sued McDonald’s after she spilled her coffee and burned herself. In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: Isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?A 2020 hot coffee injury involving Starbucks has gained national attention. According to a CNN Business article, a California jury ordered Starbucks to pay $50 million to a delivery driver severely burned by a hot beverage.Stella Liebeck, who won $2. McDonald’s over hot coffee burns, initially requested only $20,000 to cover her medical expenses.