What happened to the lady that sued McDonald’s for hot coffee?
A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc. Stella Liebeck, the 79-year-old woman who was severely burned by McDonald’s coffee that she spilled in her lap in 1992, was unfairly held up as an example of frivolous litigation in the public eye.In 1992, 79-year-old stella liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a mcdonald’s drive-thru in albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued mcdonald‘s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .The jurors awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages for her pain, suffering, and medical costs, but those damages were reduced to $160,000 because they found her 20 percent responsible. They awarded $2. That amounted to about two days of revenue for McDonald’s coffee sales.
Has anyone successfully sued McDonald’s?
McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on . She received third-degree burns over 16 percent of her body, necessitating hospitalization for eight days, whirlpool treatment for debridement of her wounds, skin grafting, scarring, and disability for more than two years. Despite these extensive injuries, she offered to settle with McDonald’s for $20,000.Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly.
How much did the lady sue McDonald’s for hot coffee?
The jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages to Liebeck, which was reduced to $160,000 in collectible damages, as the jury found Liebeck 20 percent liable for the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2. Afterward, the trial court reduced punitive damages to $480,000. Liebeck was awarded a net $160,000 in compensatory damages to cover medical expenses, and $2. The trial judge reduced the punitive damages to three times the amount of the compensatory damages, totalling $640,000.The jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages to Liebeck, which was reduced to $160,000 in collectible damages, as the jury found Liebeck 20 percent liable for the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2. Afterward, the trial court reduced punitive damages to $480,000.