Why did McDonald’s lose the hot coffee lawsuit?
Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly. McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .Executives at McDonald’s parent company were so enraged that they sued all parties involved, naming Gellar and reportedly banning her from eating at the food chain. In a 2004 interview, she recalled: I wasn’t allowed to eat there.McDonald’s is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U. S. Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald’s after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on .
What is the biggest lawsuit in McDonald’s history?
The $3 million hot coffee incident One of the most famous lawsuits in McDonald’s history happened back in the early 1990s. It all started when a 79-year-old woman named Stella Liebeck ordered a McDonald’s coffee. In 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck bought a cup of takeout coffee at a McDonald’s drive-thru in Albuquerque and spilled it on her lap. She sued McDonald’s and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Typical reaction: Isn’t coffee supposed to be hot?A 2020 hot coffee injury involving Starbucks has gained national attention. According to a CNN Business article, a California jury ordered Starbucks to pay $50 million to a delivery driver severely burned by a hot beverage.A jury found McDonald’s liable for injuries suffered by a customer who spilled hot coffee on herself, and awarded her in excess of $2. Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P. T. S. Inc. McDonald’s International, Inc.
What happened to the lady who sued McDonald’s for hot coffee?
The jurors awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages for her pain, suffering, and medical costs, but those damages were reduced to $160,000 because they found her 20 percent responsible. They awarded $2. That amounted to about two days of revenue for McDonald’s coffee sales. The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages — reduced to $160,000 because the jury found her 20 percent at fault — and $2. McDonald’s callous conduct.The jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages to Liebeck, which was reduced to $160,000 in collectible damages, as the jury found Liebeck 20 percent liable for the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2. Afterward, the trial court reduced punitive damages to $480,000.
Why was McDonald’s coffee served so hot?
However, it came to light that McDonald’s had carried out research finding that customers intend to consume the coffee immediately while driving. Another of McDonald’s reasons for serving such hot coffee is advice from consultants that high temperatures are necessary in brewing to fully extract the flavor. As a result, McDonald’s customers can’t order its espresso-based drinks, including macchiatos and Americanos. However, iced and hot brewed coffee aren’t affected and remain for sale, the fast food chain confirmed to CNN. McDonald’s said it’s still “determining the scope” of the issue, but it appears widespread.